While I have no problem admitting my own fault in things, or when “my side” (whatever that is at the time) is “bested,” I think a healthy suspicion of circumstances is also needed. As one pundit said; to paraphrase, there are conspiracy theories and then there are conspiracies of “coincidences.” For instance, when you look at Ken Blackwell, the riot of the Bush aides, voting machines where your vote disappears down a hole that cannot be observed and proven due to “proprietary software…” well that and so much more could be a conspiracy or a conspiracy of coincidences.
The “conspiracy theorist” cry, in the final analysis, is often used to shut down debate and discussion and put anyone who questions the status quo in the corner with a dunce cap of shame. That’s why I tend to avoid the “conspiracy theorist” moniker, despite some of the more inane feltergarb like Barack is not a citizen.
There are conspiracy theories backed by evidence — such as the mountain that was left in the wake of Bush/Cheney 2000 and 2004 where the Secy of State in each key state, FL and OH, was a campaign co-chair and Bush loyalist. Also, in both FL and OH, post-election procedures for recounting or storing the votes were not followed, and then there is the statistically improbable fact, on the order of winning the Power Ball lottery three times in a row, that every electronic voting machine ‘mistake’ in Ohio increased George W. Bush’s vote totals, along with Diebold CEO Wally O’Dell’s pre-election proclamation that he was going to win Ohio for Bush. That I would not call a conspiracy theory as much as grounds for prosecution.
And then there are the bizarre conspiracy theories of the right: Along with the stupid Birther myth, the ‘death panel’ nonsense is unsupported by even a shred of evidence; ACORN somehow ‘stealing’ the election for Obama is a joke; the claim that Obama plans to take away people’s guns is also fantastic; that Obama is a Stalinist despot is equally laughable, and so are all of the other right-wing conspiracy theories that lack any connection to reality.
As Rush Limbaugh allegedly told his gay college boyfriend in the early ’70s, he intentionally went after conservatives because they’d be easier to fool with his bluster and BS. He knew even back then he didn’t have a chance of selling his guff to a liberal audience — they would tend to be more skeptical and check his facts.
If you like what you read here, please feel free to drop a few pennies to help pay for our hosting. All money goes directly to the webhost, and not our empty pockets.
That smartphone can text, email, navigate, surf, organize, amuse, and waste time indefinitely. But the one thing it sucks at? Actual phone calls, writes Stephen Randall in an LA Times requiem for the land line, which "sits like a weird dusty antique on my desk. It won't let me play... […]
When they learned of his affair, John Ensign’s housemates confronted him. They told him he was ruining his marriage, and offending God. In attendance, as Ensign broke down crying, were Republicans and Democrats alike, all residents of 133 C Street, a kind of boarding house for Christian lawmakers. Chip Pickering... […]
She knows it sounds "Abe Lincolnesque," but Lenore Skenazy can't help but remember the days when kids walked to school—and can't resist taking a look at how completely crazy shepherding our kids to school has become. These days, the bus quite often stops right at each child's house ... but... […]
As the 20th anniversary of Roald Dahl's death approaches, Sam Anderson takes a look at the complicated, yet beloved, children's author. Dahl's fiction is "simultaneously thrilling and absurd and puzzling and oddly disturbing"—much like the author himself, Anderson writes in New York , noting that as one reads a recent... […]
Iran’s uranium stockpile would be sufficient to build two nuclear warheads if Tehran was able to further enrich it, according to a new report from the International Atomic Energy Agency. But Iran’s enrichment activities actually appear to be slowing; it fed uranium into only about 43% of its centrifuges, a... […]
Thousands of Google bombers have made their feelings about French president Nicolas Sarkozy known: He's a "trou du cul." That's "a crude French anatomical phrase," according to the Telegraph ; Urban Dictionary is more to the point: It means "a**hole." Search for the phrase on Google and, until recently at least,... […]
When the McDonald's in San Francisco's Haight-Ashbury neighborhood got rid of its Dollar Menu, the owner claimed it was a simple grab for more money. But the homeless who often congregate outside the restaurant say it's actually a backhanded attempt to get them to move elsewhere. Now that a McDouble... […]
After more than two weeks of horse trading and backroom deals, the three independents at the center of Australia's knife-edge election have made their choice: Julia Gillard. While the right-wing Bob Katter broke with bloc to throw his support behind the Liberal/National Coalition of Tony Abbott, Rob Oakeshott and Tony... […]
Another racism flap for Morrissey: The singer called the Chinese people a "subspecies" because of their treatment of animals, and he won't back off from the remark. "Did you see the thing on the news about their treatment of animals and animal welfare? Absolutely horrific," he says in an interview... […]
November 24th, 2009 at 1:47 PM
While I have no problem admitting my own fault in things, or when “my side” (whatever that is at the time) is “bested,” I think a healthy suspicion of circumstances is also needed. As one pundit said; to paraphrase, there are conspiracy theories and then there are conspiracies of “coincidences.” For instance, when you look at Ken Blackwell, the riot of the Bush aides, voting machines where your vote disappears down a hole that cannot be observed and proven due to “proprietary software…” well that and so much more could be a conspiracy or a conspiracy of coincidences.
The “conspiracy theorist” cry, in the final analysis, is often used to shut down debate and discussion and put anyone who questions the status quo in the corner with a dunce cap of shame. That’s why I tend to avoid the “conspiracy theorist” moniker, despite some of the more inane feltergarb like Barack is not a citizen.
November 24th, 2009 at 7:49 PM
There are conspiracy theories backed by evidence — such as the mountain that was left in the wake of Bush/Cheney 2000 and 2004 where the Secy of State in each key state, FL and OH, was a campaign co-chair and Bush loyalist. Also, in both FL and OH, post-election procedures for recounting or storing the votes were not followed, and then there is the statistically improbable fact, on the order of winning the Power Ball lottery three times in a row, that every electronic voting machine ‘mistake’ in Ohio increased George W. Bush’s vote totals, along with Diebold CEO Wally O’Dell’s pre-election proclamation that he was going to win Ohio for Bush. That I would not call a conspiracy theory as much as grounds for prosecution.
And then there are the bizarre conspiracy theories of the right: Along with the stupid Birther myth, the ‘death panel’ nonsense is unsupported by even a shred of evidence; ACORN somehow ‘stealing’ the election for Obama is a joke; the claim that Obama plans to take away people’s guns is also fantastic; that Obama is a Stalinist despot is equally laughable, and so are all of the other right-wing conspiracy theories that lack any connection to reality.
As Rush Limbaugh allegedly told his gay college boyfriend in the early ’70s, he intentionally went after conservatives because they’d be easier to fool with his bluster and BS. He knew even back then he didn’t have a chance of selling his guff to a liberal audience — they would tend to be more skeptical and check his facts.