
The Last American Man by Elizabeth Gilbert 9780142002834 PB $15.00
Eustace Conway grew up in the suburbs of the Carolinas in the 1960′s and 70′s. Encouraged by his mother and driven by the disapproval of his father, Eustace became the quintessential mountain man. Think “My Side of the Mountain” for a lifetime. Eustace accomplishes a great deal during his lifetime: accumulating 1000 acres of mountain land, building and running an educational facility to teach practical skills to adults and school children, epic trips by horseback across the US, but there is a dark side to Eustace. The authoritarianism of his maternal Grandfather, seems to combine with the rigid disapproval of his father into a man who desperately wants to teach practical skills to American youth before it’s too late, but who can’t bend enough to understand, listen to or even tolerate, his students.
Eustace accomplishes a great deal, and deserves recognition for that. Ultimately the book reveals not the “Last American Man”, but the last of a man whose desperate search for paternal approval, feeds a drive that ultimately costs him the ability to actually live the life he desired.
——————————————-
Joyce Lovelace
“Do unto those downstream as you would
have those upstream do unto you.”
— Wendell Berry
by Ana Grarian on Thu, Jul 15, 2010
I have to admit that e-Readers are a little tempting. Relatively small and light weight, I can carry an entire library in one book size gadget, promise to not hurt the eyes like reading on the computer, instantly download from the e-cloud. They are just a little more expensive than I would spend on a “gadget”. And here’s why…
One thing that electronics have shown me is that from music to movies, computers to cameras, my device will become outdated and unsupported before it becomes unusable. Planned obsolescence.
As long as I can see well enough to read…..
I’ll stick with a book.
by Ana Grarian on Sun, Jul 11, 2010
Comments Off
This mini review and comment was posted by a friend of mine over at Cybil Discourse.
It is reposted here with permission.
“Girl with the Dragon Tattoo”
I went to see the Swedish movie “Män som hatar kvinnor“, based on the book “The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo” by Stieg Larsson. I had read the book a year or so ago, and had heard about the film from co-workers, so I knew it was a disturbing and violent film.
I am not sure how I would have reacted if I had not read the book. I loved the film. What I liked most is that the film was gritty. Unlike American films the actors had flaws, they did not look plastic. Nor did the scenery. The buildings looked as if they actually existed warts and all. The movement of the characters looked real.
One effect of this reality was to portray the sexual violence as violent. To my sensibilities this film evoked the very disturbing nature of sexual violence. This film has a scene of sexual violence against a man. It is very graphic.
Watching that scene made me think about why men just don’t grasp the reality of sexual violence aginst women. I realized that it is because most men do not experiance it. If you are a woman who is fortunate enough to have not been raped, assaulted or abused, you most likely know several women who have.
According to RAINN: The nation’s largest anti-sexual assault organization.
1 in 6 women will be sexually assaulted in therir lifetime. (1 in 33 men)
Every 2 minutes someone in the US is sexually assaulted.
44% of sexual assault victims are under 18.
15% are under 12.
Only 6% of all rapists ever spend a day in jail.
See the film. Afterward think about that scene. Look around you and think of 1 in every 6 guys you know having experienced something akin to that. Then think about how you would feel if women routinely sat around masturbating to those images. Then you will have a slight idea of what it means to be a woman in the US and trying to have a healthy relationship with sex.
Post a comment...by Ana Grarian on Wed, Jun 2, 2010
Comments Off
Ana took time off from lobbying and blogging to have a quiet night out at a local cinema. Having seen the trailer for Ghost Writer, I expected to see a finely honed, suspense filled drama, loosely based on recent politics.
Directed by Roman Polanski, and starring well qualified actors such as Ewan McGregor as the ghost writer, Pierce Bronson as a Tony Blair type former Prime Minister, Olivia Williams of Dollhouse fame, and even Jim Belushi almost unrecognizable in is role as a publisher (the voice gave him away), all of whom performed well.
Even so the film was disappointing. The suspense was just not there. There were plenty of twists and turns so I would have to say the writing was the problem. I just could not beleive that McGregor’s character would take the risks involved to solve the plot.
On another note I was happy to see that the film did not go in for a lot of cheap sex, though I also could not buy that McGregor’s character would risk sex with Lang’s wife given that he thought his life might be in danger.
If you have the chance – go see another film.
Post a comment...by Ken Carman on Fri, Oct 23, 2009
Comments Off

Courtesy latimes and AP
Soupy Sales is dead at 83, one of my icons I base my routines on.
It was rare when my middle brother and I agreed as kids. When Bullwinkle offered two alternate titles for the next episode we would choose different ones. I’m surprised we even agreed about Bullwinkle or Crusader Rabbit. Since he ran the TV early Saturdays, I finally saw Howdy Doody at the end of the last show.
“Hey that looks like it might have been good!’
“No, it’s stupid.”
(Hence I’m the children’s entertainer with puppets and he’s not.)
But we agreed about Soupy. Soupy Sales offered one of the best versions of slapstick, deadpan looks at the camera and fiction narratives about, amongst many things, his pretty much never seen dog “Fang” during the 60s. I think at best we may have seen a huge paw coming from off camera. “Fang” was specifically funny for us because we had had a dog named Lucky who probably bit everyone in the family we eventually had to put down, adding humor to a very unfunny, tense, then sad situation. He even managed to make pies in the face funny sometimes, amazing even back then when it was already a ho hum cliche’.
I’ll never forget that we were watching when he got kicked off the air for a brief while. He looked into the camera and, with what should have been a trademarked smirk, he said; paraphrased…
“Do you know where your Mommy’s purse is boys and girls? Find the thing inside with green stuff sticking out, put it into a stamped envelope and send it to Soupy Sales, Channel 5…”
I turned to my brother and said, “He’s going to get in trouble for that…”
How’s this for irony…
“He was born Milton Supman on Jan. 28, 1926, in the North Carolina backwater of Franklinton. The Supmans were the only Jews in town. Sales’ father ran a dry goods store that sold sheets to the Ku Klux Klan.”
“The family name was often mispronounced as “Soupman.” To make matters worse, his parents, who had nicknamed his brothers ‘Hambone’ and ‘Chickenbone,’ dubbed him ‘Soupbone.’ Eventually, Milton became just Soupy.”
Link
Because any good comedian knows where the line is between acceptable and not, they walk that line and may step over it occasionally. I find those who don’t usually beyond “un-funny.”
Soupy knew where that thin line was and his dance down it was a marvel to watch. Since some of his shows were live, if I remember right, his missteps and trips were even better.
So let’s be serious for a moment and remember Soupy…


Courtesy i.zdnet.com
Hard isn’t it? Good. Soupy would have wanted it that way.
by Ken Carman on Mon, Apr 20, 2009
Comments Off
Cage is one of those actors that is just a tad too dry and sedate for me, but I felt this worked well with Knowing. The premise, if you haven’t heard, is that a time capsule for a school contains a “picture” drawn by a little girl that consists of numbers. She furiously wrote the numbers instead of the picture of the future requested by her teacher. But these numbers are far better than a drawing: they predicted the future. Most of that has already passed, but there are more numbers left. Just a few.
Most of the movie is the actors trying to play catch up with the dead on accuracy of the predictions and their personal relationships. The film is shot with a lot of blue-ish gray hues and is quite intense.
There is an interesting alien element to the script that gets fully reveled as it progresses, and one wonders if this isn’t just another example of multi-layered relationship expose’, only human/alien, that runs so deep through this movie.
It’s not the best movie, by any means, but the special effects and emotional intensity of it might make it worthy of a big screen viewing, rather than a rental. Catch it quick: there is about to be a big influx of new movies including the newest in the Trek franchise. It surely will get bumped soon in your area, if it hasn’t already.
I won’t spoil it, even though I find the movie quite predictable. Yet that doesn’t seem to hurt it in the slightest. Let’s just say if you have to have a happy ending you may, or may not, want to go to this movie. Depends upon your definition of “happy.”
Post a comment...by Ken Carman on Thu, Apr 16, 2009
Comments Off
It’s very light fare. I wouldn’t go there is something more mentally challenging or with dense scripting were available. But Reaper is good fun. You have a just barely beyond kid employee of a Home Depot-like store, his wannabe/not wannabe girlfriend, his two buds who help him track down people escaped from Hell: one’s a helpless romantic so desperate he recently decided to take up with a demon, and the other is an over weight sex-crazed pervert who somehow doesn’t manage to turn every woman off on the planet the innuendo-laced litany he spouts.
Even Satan is good for a few laughs.
The side stories are about as interesting as the souls he needs to send back to Hell and the odd vessels Satan gives him to catch them.
If you’re looking for Hellish fun without all those dark brooding Supernatural-like clouds hanging heavy, try Reaper.
Post a comment...by Ken Carman on Mon, Apr 13, 2009
Comments Off
You may remember my Inspection column from a few months back about Jay Ward. I mentioned the show they had on briefly called,Fractured Flickers. I just happened to run into this today. The hilarious thing is Ward would make sure the guest didn’t know what was actually going to happen during the interview. This was planned and, even once it became obvious amongst industry types that they were going to do something off kilter, the guest never allowed to know what. I think Barbara Eden handled this quite well.
Post a comment...
by Ken Carman on Mon, Apr 13, 2009
Comments Off
…but I’m beginning to wish someone would drive a stake through its wretched heart.
The venue: TV… though X-Files hit the big screen.
The premise: everything out there we can imagine, usually bad, is true. And a conspiracy… good or bad. (Yes, there are “good” conspiracies. Just think of Men in Black and the reason given by Tommy Lee Jones description as to why they don’t just let people know what’s going on.)
I didn’t watch a lot of X-Files. After a few I told my wife, Millie, “This is the same story, they just keep switching the monsters and aliens.” So I missed that delightful stage in the end where the writers get bored with their hackney premise and start… writing. It can be fun. They add a lot of stuff into the mix that, occasionally, does nothing to save a program that should have been strangled along with the idiot who suggested it.
Yeah, I’m talking to you Mr. or Ms. barely 20-something who should be looking for a real job, instead of earning more than I’ll ever earn in three or four lifetimes. (Whine, bitch, moan, pity self, then start again.)
To keep this article focused, I’m going to stick mostly with the monster side of this premise: adding just a smidgen of alien too. I suppose the first time I started switching to, instead of away, from this premise was Special Unit 2. Special Unit 2 didn’t take itself seriously. You had a smartass, strong-willed, policewoman who almost loses her job because of what she sees and does… but gets promoted: turned team member… teamed up with a smartass, chauvinistic, male partner: both seeking out creatures of the night (or day) who shouldn’t be noticed in civilized society.
Why is it I’m tempted to type that we’re probably the creatures who shouldn’t be out in the day or night? Well, these two capture and place the dangerous creatures in holding cells. There’s always some place to hold creatures, an idea stolen from Ghostbusters, I suppose. Hey, how about this? The power goes off or someone triggers the cages open in at least two or three episodes? Maybe I should write for Hollywood! That was easy! Nah, I’m, not that cheap. That’s why I’d rather write for a web-site I partially own and pay for the privilege.
Oops-sie.
Special Unit 2 , starring Michael Landes as Detective Nicholas O’Malley, Alexondra Lee as Detective Kate Benson; who almost gets kicked off the police force because of what she does and sees… then gets promoted to Special Unit 2… and the always entertaining Carl the Gnome (Danny Woodburn), started on UPN, and UPN programming was just so above this that… no, it wasn’t. That couldn’t have killed it. No, I’m sure it was the X-er factor. After all this is serious business, damn it! And the everything is true crowd wanted their “everything is true” premise taken seriously.
It was light. It was fun. I liked it. X-ers probably hated it with a passion.
So BBC responded with Torchwood.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Torchwood, a far more serious endeavor where the monsters; real of course, were quite dangerous. This show had some of the best writing I’ve seen backing up this premise. It also adds in a very strong X-Filer attraction: aliens and alien tech. Far, far less monsters; more aliens.
This program starred John Barrowman as Captain Jack Harness; a man who can’t die, and Eve Myles as Gwen Cooper; police liaison. Same idea. Police woman sees and does things that almost gets her kicked off the force, only to be promoted: snatched away by a secret organization.
Didn’t I already type something like that before?
By now, a big yawn, right?
But other than the great scripting, which featured in one great episode a young ghost who had tried to get attention in life from them, but follows them around in one episode and shows how even his life had meaning, Torchwood has character development plus. Those two stars don’t always outshine the rest of the cast by any means.
Sci Fi ran it for a while and loved it so much they dumped it for the vastly inferior Sanctuary. This should have been a win win for them. Built around a proven acting commodity: Amanda Tapping from the TV version of Stargate, who plays a woman who can’t die. Gee, where have you read that before? These writers really do work hard for their money. They slapped a really bad wig, or hair coloring, on Amanda and now she sports an equally bad Brit accent. That’s bad news, cause Amanda has British roots. Is this a case where doing “American” so long and so well has ruined a lilt, or did Canada strip it from her syntax? Damn Canadians. They’re to blame for everything, or so South Park “informs” me.
Let’s all sing…
“Blame Canada, blame Canada…”
If I remember right there’s also the “someone almost got kicked off” some police-type force type element here as well.
To the writers “doing” (as in rape, I suppose) Sanctuary: hey, guys, didn’t your teacher tell you in school that to mimic others was rude? Especially when your scripting is so damn uneven and downright poor. I never did quite get the whole idea of her institute or who it served, unlike Torchwood. They tried to do it in expose’, which is a bad idea: especially when you wait more than a few episodes and then attempt to explain… again… poorly.
One can’t leave this venue without mentioning Supernatural. What sells this is not the, by now, far beyond trite premise, or that there’s no longer an institute, just two brothers who somehow manage to never get caught pretending to be FBI, CIA, Shriners, Loyal Order of the Perverted Moose… whatever the demon/devil/monster gig calls for. They don’t even bother to join some police-type force. They just pretend. It’s their dark-ish love/hate relationship that sells the show that, in my opinion, is something all brothers should identify with. These guys may save each others ghastly, Hell-ish bound, bacon a lot, but sometimes you know they wonder, “Why do I do it? He’s so damn annoying!”
They’ve also gotten to the, “Oh, golly gee, I’m bored with this, let’s add in stuff like they have been made to forget who they are, but still kind of work together” stage. That these writers seem to script quite well, considering that their using a premise so worn by now even Jack the Ripper wouldn’t bother. (“Jack” is actually one of the few semi/sort of interesting characters in Sanctuary) The religious overtones in Supernatural can get so heavy sometimes I wish I could wipe the brimstone and the far less than angelic angel puked up food off me. These “angels” are so dark I often wonder if they work for the other side like the Vietnamese used to sneak away and do.
So that’s the premise.
Now excuse me. I’m looking for a silver bullet or a stake. No, not the actors. I’m hunting writers and TV execs.
Proudly using Dynamic Headers by Nicasio WordPress Design
by LT Saloon on Sun, Aug 15, 2010
Comments Off