Archive | July, 2009
Inspection- Honest Libertarianism
Note: I am not specifically arguing with some classic definition of Libertarianism here, more a few specific Libertarians I have encountered and some glaring inconsistencies amongst these same folks who claim to be Libertarians.
Oh, boy, as if my limited readership needs to be thinned by ticking off Libertarians? But, hey, I didn’t start Inspection 37 years ago to get hugs and deep throated French kisses. Besides, getting French kissed by the actual Deep Throat these days? Ewe.
I don’t know exactly what to call myself politically speaking and I admit I do tend to resist labels. Too much like bad boxes of cornflakes; they may be less than half full, or even full of something you didn’t realize was there because you’re too busy looking at the label on the box. Seems sometimes these days that’s all we see. In fact I would suggest the majority of people that’s all they ever see, sad to say. This is why labels are powerful propaganda.
I consider myself to have some libertarian tendencies. I think, for the most part, what consenting adults do is up to them…
1. When it comes to sex, I would rather not know about the sloppy pig entrails, the light tasering, the knitting needles and God knows whatever that slippery substance on them is, thank you. Very personal things like sex the Government should probably stay out of most the time. There are exceptions, of course. There always are.
2. While I’m not a legalize all drugs advocate, I think our approach to drugs needs to be closer to “what consenting adults do…” mantra and “stop encouraging those who will always profit from making something illegal” concept. That means I’m pro a mild approach to illegality concerning drugs for the most part… please remember my exceptions rule. Drugs are a personal situation, best handled by families, churches, friends, relatives… and any government intervention needs to encourage them to help each other; not be the bloodied ax/hatch job the law and enforcement is right now. These laws; fully enforced, can destroy the individual and hack apart the family by being all draconian far more than drugs themselves do. That says a lot. Drug abuse mangles all the aforementioned on its own way the hell too much, thank you. But what we have now that’s supposed to solve that problem doesn’t work. It often makes it far, far worse.
3. We should be able to believe (or not) whatever we want, like the Gods are pleased when we sacrifice all Brussels sprouts. I’ll even help. They’re disgusting.
As far as how we practice what we believe… well, different topic, but I think the exceptions rule applies here a lot.
So, as you can tell, I have a few disagreements regarding Libertarians in general and their philosophy… for the most part. But this really isn’t about me. It’s about you, Mr., Mrs., Libertarian.
Can we have some honesty here, please?
I understand Libertarian mantras about less government. I comprehend that government is often quite inefficient at best. I even agree; when it comes to the personal, individual, end of the spectrum of society that less to no regulation is often the best course.
Where Libertarianism, to me, falls flat is in almost all other applications…
For example, if we’re going to be honest about this free enterprise does it better and more efficient than government mantra some spout, then we have to stop making exceptions for the military. Now before anyone get all puffed up with anger and angst, calm the hell down. I actually don’t think we should. We probably disagree regarding how much and what we should fund, but those are really different topics.
This, as I typed, is about honesty and to add another qualifier: consistency.
Then we have the “Socialism” cry that sprouts forth like conversational poison ivy every time there’s a mere suggestion we should help the poor, keep the homeless from cluttering our streets or prevent them from jamming up our emergency rooms by providing a modicum of health care. Some of this comes under the category of “taking out the garbage.” If we didn’t have some services our streets would be lined with garbage, people would be dying needlessly and the baby boom generation might be in danger of becoming the first to be exposed to mandatory euthanasia. (I’m obviously using “garbage” and “trash” in a very wide sense. The first: trash services, in most places, we have. (Damn those Socialists.) The second is already happening. And if you don’t think the third might happen… then you haven’t been paying attention to job losses, the absence of a safety net and a younger generation who has no tolerance for a vast number of aging boomers cluttering up their lives and society. Mark my words, if we don’t do something about it, euthanasia will become not just legal, which in some cases I think it should be, but mandatory. That, I fear.
But let’s just forget all I just typed. Ignore it. Just think I’m “full of it.” Let’s get back to the military.
If we’re going to get into all this abusive “Socialism is a curse word” blather, what do you think the economic model the military is run on? It goes beyond mere Socialism. We often clothe them, feed them, house them, tell them what to think… well, perhaps “not to think” is the best descriptive sometimes… where to go…
Hell, that’s not “Socialism,” it’s more like the worst forms of Communism, but there’s a reason why we do this: like picking up the “trash,” in all its metaphorical and literal: less than metaphorical, forms: we also need to protect ourselves. The Capitalism/representative/democratic models are not good models for the military. Just like allowing anyone to not pay for garbage pickup and then do whatever with their trash is a bad idea. On a small scale no services like fire, police, garbage, water: etc., works “OK,” but as a rule for cities and all of humanity… not so well. And if your pro-free enterprise, what do you call a system that forces people to purchase a service? Certainly not “free.”
So… back to the military as one example of where some Libertarians fall short on honesty.
If some of you have any desire to be honest about this “government sucks at everything and business doesn’t” mantra: defund the military. Let them have bake sales, force states to pay for their own protection if they must rather than just hand everything over to “We Kill For Profit, Inc.” Any states that don’t fund it or give it all to The Bomb Whomever You Pay Us To Company… hell, I’m sure Osama might not mind a new base of operation. Just let him have it. Of course the states would have to do all this without taxing. Get all entrepreneurial. Be creative! Make soldiers pay for everything; even their weapons, their planes, their grenades, the ships they float around the world in. Sell a few states if they won’t cooperate. Hey, Florida has some prime beach property. DC has great buildings. And who the hell wants Toledo anyway?
Or maybe we could go slow and build up to free market defense. We have KBR/Halliburton and Blackwater do it until some other nation or entity pays them more: since that’s what mercenaries do. Admittedly this will be just a rough beginning before turning all over to the wonders of a supposedly “free” market. It worked so well so far, you know. If Osama, or some other whack job, offers more, well… them’s the breaks. Makes it all better eventually. All evens out in the long run, right?
And also consider the marvelous no bid “free” enterprise system! Soldiers got all they needed in a timely fashion and on the cheap, just like they did in Iraq and Afghanistan. No electrocuted in showers soldiers due to shoddy workmanship. And Blackwater’s image in Iraq is part Santa, part Jesus. These saintly messengers of mercenary-based “free” enterprise have turned even the insurgents into flag waving, beer guzzling American wannabes.
Just like having a mega store who can undersell everyone and use unfair business practices. Hey, since the advent of Wally Mart downtowns are thriving all over America!
Now let’s move on to the commons. What an incredible nirvana where prosecutors prosecute only for the money and who pays more, defendants get defended only when they’re rich enough, and defended well when they’re even richer and well known. Hey, we’ve almost arrived at that specific part of nirvana already.
Wait. Almost everything I just typed beyond…
“Let them have bake sales…”
…is total litter box droppings. Pretty much 180 degrees opposite of what will actually happen, and in far too many cases has happened. So if you think all of that was a little bit of a Swiftian proposal, well, I would only argue with the modifying phrase “little bit of a.”
Or, if you’d rather approach it more honestly, you could admit that a supposedly free, unregulated, market doesn’t always serve everything well. Stop claiming that business regulates itself; naturally: without any “interference.” That’s about as irrational as claiming public servants always have our best interests at heart. Predatory capitalism does exist, just like Reagan’s predatory “I’m here to help you” government bureaucrats do. Neither is “all predatory, all the time.”
You’d also admit that government in bed with business all the time is as bad as government always viewing business as an adversary. Just like people, sometimes business needs a helping hand. Sometimes it needs a watchful eye and even a firm stick.
Yes, we really do need to have an open, honest, non-”but that’s Socialism” blather discussion in this society. There are some endeavors that do well mostly unregulated, some that are best well regulated and and more than one or two that are best left mostly to government. And, as you may have notice, all those qualifiers I just used mean pretty much nothing in society is best all government controlled, or best all business run, or always better totally unregulated, or… yes… regulated to death. This is true honesty, Mr. and Mrs. Libertarian, not this “government is never the answer and business always is” tripe. Such reasoning is as much snake oil as “government is always the answer” would be.
Yes, this is a better path to honest Libertarianism. Can we take it, together? I hope so. Because some of you who just spout this mindless “government does nothing well and business does everything better” nonsense are beyond annoying.
You’re acting as if you’re incredibly stupid.
-30-
Inspection is a column that has been written by Ken Carman for over 30 years. Inspection is dedicated to looking at odd angles, under all the rocks and into the unseen cracks and crevasses that constitute the issues and philosophical constructs of our day: places few think, or even dare, to venture.
© Copyright 2009
Ken Carman and Cartenual Productions
All Rights Reserved
Right-Wing Talkers: How Low Will They Go?
by RS Janes on Fri, Jul 31, 2009
Comments Off
Sure, they are contemptible, cynical buffoons; drama queen fearmongers scraping the bottom of the barrel for ratings now that the neocon bubble has burst and they likely don’t believe a word they say. (It’s a performance!) Still, how much pure stupidity and racism do they have to spew before sponsors pull their ads and an outraged public demands their dismissal?
One of the Funniest Things I’ve Read Lately…
by RS Janes on Thu, Jul 30, 2009
Comments Off
…reproduced in full. A toast to Mr. Wolfrum for hitting these nails squarely on their empty heads.
New Poll: 80% of Americans would give up breathing if it helped corporations make more money
by William K. Wolfrum
from his blog William K. Wolfrum ChroniclesSOUTH CAROLINA – A stunning new poll by William K. Wolfrum & Associates shows that nearly 80 percent of all Americans would stop breathing right now if a major corporation gave that order.
The poll – which was based on looking into how Americans will gladly vote against their own self interests – made several other discoveries, including:
Post a comment...• 78 percent of Americans would rather die a terrible death that leaves their families bankrupt than have the elite pay higher taxes for government health care.
• 67 percent of Americans would saw off their left foot to have a Wal-Mart built next door to them;
• 62 percent of Americans would shoot themselves in the head if it meant the richest Americans would receive a tax break, and;
• 59 percent of Americans would rather see tax money given to banks, or used to kill Middle Easterners than have the same money used on health care in the U.S.
Noted sociologist Tim Johnson of Tupelo, Miss., said that the poll is in line with how many Americans feel.
“In the U.S., it’s all about striving to be rich,” said Johnson. “And if you fail, you’re out. So better let the successful amongst us thrive than worry about the vast majority of Americans, who are abject failures at getting rich.”
Republicans were quick to jump on the poll numbers.
“Americans are selfless people. So selfless, they’ll always vote against their own interests,” said Louisiana Governor Bobb Jindal. “At the GOP, we’re aware of that and confident it will again lead us to power.”
More than 1,000 people took the poll, though many refused to accept the free pencils given out to fill out the poll, claiming it was a “socialist act” and that they should be “punished for not having their own pencils.”
–WKW
Copyright 2009 William K. Wolfrum.
Ye Olde Scribe Presents: Navigating Tasteless Presidential Beer
by Professor Good Ales on Thu, Jul 30, 2009
Comments Off
A note from Professor Good Ales: Because of content this post has also been posted elsewhere at LTS.
"If only he'd get off his DUFF and order a REAL beer."
Written by Ye Olde Scribe
(Scribe is simply providing a convenient pun and admits to having never tasted Duff, which apparently is a real product inspired by the fictional Duff. But he does dedicate this column to Duffman style politics being practiced in the White House on the day this was posted.)
Scribe longs for an Arrogant Bastard President. No, not Saint Junior, may he rest in peace.
Not dead yet?
After choking on a pretzel and the transportation device accident, Scribe is surprised. Well… enough of that SEGWAY.
No, Scribe is referring to an actual beer made by Stone Brewing.
Yes, it also serves as a metaphor. Which is better than a gaggle of gagging girls wearing ugly pinafores, but not quite as classy as an H.M.S. Pinafore’.
Anywhosiefloosiewhatsis, gosh by Golly, Mr. Gilbert and Sullied Van… (Scribe owned a sullied van of those once… all painted up in the classic artsy style, but cleaned the art off it before he sold it to some maurading mariachi band musicians. But they had trouble making the VAN… GOGH.) …this substantial brew does a decent job of burning to pleasantly tingling the tastebuds; as do many full flavored micros these days.
Scribe longs for a President with similar strong character; firm, resolute… who won’t compromise so easily. Bold. Brave. A President with enough actual audacity, fortitude and final gravity to actual order a decent beer while trying to make peace between the good Skipper “I arrest people in their homes for speaking their minds” Officer Crowley and the Professor.
What is this, some strange version of Gilligan’s Island?
He ordered Bud Lite? Well, at least it’s not Mich Ultra, the only beverage, if one dares call it, where the infused bubbles are embarrased to be in a liquid with less taste than water.
His beer buds don’t have any more class…
Red Stripe? Hey, just what we need, something that partially attempts to clone the bad bland brews the biggies have offered for many a decade.
Blue Moon?
Well, at least it’s an attempt, though a rotten one to the COORS.
So two guys might make peace by hiding behind mediocre’ fizz?
Scribe predicts a whole lot of nada out of this meeting. And he’s NOT just referring to THE BEER.
Until the next STUPID, over blown by the press, racial incident, this is your faithful servant who salivates for REAL BEER…
Ye Olde Scribe
Ye Olde Scribe Presents: Navigating Tasteless Presidential Beer
by Ye Olde Scribe on Thu, Jul 30, 2009
A note from Professor Good Ales: Because of content this post has also been posted on the beer site.
"If only he'd get off his DUFF and order a REAL beer."
Written by Ye Olde Scribe
(Scribe is simply providing a convenient pun and admits to having never tasted Duff, which apparently is a real product inspired by the fictional Duff. But he does dedicate this column to Duffman style politics being practiced in the White House on the day this was posted.)
Scribe longs for an Arrogant Bastard President. No, not Saint Junior, may he rest in peace.
Not dead yet?
After choking on a pretzel and the transportation device accident, Scribe is surprised. Well… enough of that SEGWAY.
No, Scribe is referring to an actual beer made by Stone Brewing.
Yes, it also serves as a metaphor. Which is better than a gaggle of gagging girls wearing ugly pinafores, but not quite as classy as an H.M.S. Pinafore’.
Anywhosiefloosiewhatsis, gosh by Golly, Mr. Gilbert and Sullied Van… (Scribe owned a sullied van once… all painted up in the classic artsy style, but cleaned the art off it before he sold it to some maurading mariachi band musicians. But they had trouble making the VAN… GOGH.) …this substantial brew does a decent job of burning to pleasantly tingling the tastebuds; as do many full flavored micros these days.
Scribe longs for a President with similar strong character; firm, resolute… who won’t compromise so easily. Bold. Brave. A President with enough actual audacity, fortitude and final gravity to actual order a decent beer while trying to make peace between the good Skipper “I arrest people in their homes for speaking their minds” Officer Crowley and the Professor.
What is this, some strange version of Gilligan’s Island?
He ordered Bud Lite? Well, at least it’s not Mich Ultra, the only beverage, if one dares call it, where the infused bubbles are embarrased to be in a liquid with less taste than water.
His beer buds don’t have any more class…
Red Stripe? Hey, just what we need, something that partially attempts to clone the bad bland brews the biggies have offered for many a decade.
Blue Moon?
Well, at least it’s an attempt, though a rotten one to the COORS.
So two guys might make peace by hiding behind mediocre’ fizz?
Scribe predicts a whole lot of nada out of this meeting. And he’s NOT just referring to THE BEER.
Until the next STUPID, over blown by the press, racial incident, this is your faithful servant who salivates for REAL BEER…
Ye Olde Scribe
Beer Profile: Sherwood Forest Maiden’s Blueberry Ale
by Professor Good Ales on Thu, Jul 30, 2009
Reviewed by Ken Carman
Has a distinct blueberry nose but seems to be missing it in the taste. Otherwise an excellent beer with almost a Mild body; kind of like their Archer’s Ale which is excellent too… though that is described by their website as an English Pale. I’m assuming they dry hopped with blueberries or juice/extract rather than brewing with them. Blueberry is tough to brew with and it can disappear after a short while, so I’m a little less critical than I might be. Might want to address the taste though, if possible. No hop sense, but one would expect that. Hops would probably distract even more from the needed blueberry taste.
Jim Crowley — Any Relation to Monica?
by RS Janes on Thu, Jul 30, 2009
Comments Off
Today’s Quote: TV or Not TV?
by RS Janes on Wed, Jul 29, 2009
Comments Off
Post a comment...“Everything Americans think they know, they learned from a televised morality play. It’s all theater. You root for some good guy and boo some bad guy. You pick your own, but you dance to the tune of the men running the show. It’s mind control, pure and simple, and if there is an American immune to it, then he is probably living in a snow cave somewhere in Alaska.”
– Gypsy Joe Hess (1919-1988), prospector, self-educated philosopher and horse trader, as quoted by Joe Bageant.
Looking for Something?
Site Membership
- To Enter Contributor Area:
- Want to be a Contributor?
- Recover password
Tip Jar for Hosting Costs
If you like what you read here, please feel free to drop a few pennies to help pay for our hosting. All money goes directly to the webhost, and not our empty pockets.
Click here to donate
by Ken Carman on Fri, Jul 31, 2009
1 Comment